TTTakeover Tracker
Full Transparency

How We Calculate Risk

Every score is reproducible. No black boxes. Two methodologies power Takeover Tracker: the daily macro index and per-occupation risk scores.

Daily Displacement Index

The macro-level AI takeover score updated daily

115 min

Collect

9 async collectors pull signals from RSS, BLS, FRED, GDELT, Reddit, HN, SEC EDGAR, layoff trackers, and benchmarks.

2AI-powered

Extract

Gemini classifies each signal: category, sectors, sentiment, impact score, and displacement direction.

372 calls

Score

24 parallel scoring calls (4 sectors x 6 categories) with self-consistency sampling (3x median).

4Deterministic

Calculate

Pure math: weighted geometric mean, hype discount, dual-EMA smoothing, 2-point daily movement cap.

Signal Category Weights

How each data source type contributes to the daily score

Labor market dataLagging

BLS employment, job postings, layoff data — most reliable ground truth

25%
Corporate adoptionCoincident

Earnings calls, enterprise AI spending, hiring patterns

25%
AI capability benchmarksLeading

Model benchmarks, task performance — hype-discounted

15%
Economic indicatorsCoincident

GDP per worker, productivity data, sector output

15%
Sentiment & hypeLeading

Social media, news volume — heavily discounted

10%
Regulatory signalsModifying

AI legislation, executive orders, industry standards

10%

Job Sector Weights

30%

Knowledge

Legal, finance, consulting

25%

Service

Support, sales, admin

25%

Technical

Software, data, IT

20%

Creative

Writing, design, marketing

Scoring Formula

Geometric Mean Aggregation

HDI method — prevents one hot sector from inflating the overall index. Each sector's weighted score contributes proportionally.

Hype Discount

When hype signals exceed 2x reality signals, capability scores are reduced 15% and sentiment 50%. Keeps the index grounded.

Dual-EMA Smoothing

70% slow (~90-day) + 30% fast (~20-day) exponential moving average. Prevents day-to-day noise from dominating.

Movement Cap

Maximum 2-point daily change with 30% carry-forward. Large swings are dampened and partially applied over subsequent days.

Source Credibility Hierarchy

1.0xPeer-reviewed research, BLS/government data
0.8xIndustry surveys, consulting firm reports
0.5xCEO predictions, company announcements
0.3xSocial media, opinion pieces

Scoring Thresholds

Each score level maps to observable labor market conditions

0%Pre-AI baseline (~2019)
10%Early tools — AI assists with drafts, code suggestions, basic analysis
20%Established assistance — entry-level task automation beginning
30%Task transformation — AI handles 25–30% of routine cognitive tasks
40%Role compression — teams doing more with fewer people
50%Role restructuring — most firms halved entry-level hiring
60%Human premium emerging — standard knowledge work is AI-first
75%Human premium dominant — humans add value only through creativity and judgment
90%Near-complete automation — minimal human oversight
100%Economic non-viability — human labor offers no cost advantage
Part 2

Per-Occupation Risk Scoring

Individual displacement scores for 900+ occupations using O*NET task data

Task Risk Formula

Every task in an occupation is classified into one of five categories and scored for AI capability:

task_risk = base_risk × 0.6 + ai_capability_score × 0.4

Tasks are weighted by estimated time fraction to produce the raw score:

raw_task_score = Σ(task_risk × time_fraction)

Task Categories & Base Risk

Higher base risk = more automatable task type

Routine Cognitive82/100
Routine Manual55/100
Non-Routine Analytical45/100
Non-Routine Interpersonal25/100
Non-Routine Manual15/100

Protective Factors

Five factors can reduce the raw score by up to 55%:

final_score = raw_task_score × (1 - protective_discount)
Social Intelligence15%

Empathy, negotiation, reading social cues

Creativity12%

Novel ideation, artistic expression, innovation

Decision Complexity10%

Ambiguous judgment, ethical reasoning, strategic calls

Regulatory Barriers10%

Licensing, legal requirements, safety standards

Fine Manipulation8%

Dexterous physical tasks, precision work

Risk Tiers

75 – 100

Critical Risk

50 – 74

High Risk

25 – 49

Medium Risk

0 – 24

Low Risk

See It In Action

Explore the data yourself

Search 900+ occupations, compare risk scores, and see exactly how each job is scored.